Studies built from the vendor corpus, not from a survey nobody answered
Findings from the 328 vendor profiles in the Content Hub, each scored on the same eight published facts. Every figure in a report is recomputed from those profiles when the page is rebuilt, so a report and the profiles behind it cannot drift apart. One market study and thirty-one vendor reviews are live.
Published studies
Each report states its method, its capture date and what it is not. Numbers are computed from the corpus at build time rather than typed in, so a figure in a report and the profile behind it always agree.
Medical record review pricing →
What 328 vendors publish about price, and what 185 of them do not. Every published per-page rate in one table.
2026-08-23 · 9 min read
Switching from InPractice AI, Dodon AI, ChatGPT, and Claude →
Four de-identified switching stories from August 2026, complaints quoted near-verbatim: duplicate-page billing on InPractice AI, merged VA notes on Dodon AI, ChatGPT's 10,000-page warning, and no BAA on Claude.
2026-09-02 · 10 min read
Wisedocs review →
Built from published materials: chronologies with clinician QA, days-not-weeks turnaround, no published pricing, and alternatives to weigh.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
DigitalOwl review →
Built from published materials: structured data for insurers, 24-hour self-serve delivery, subscription pricing with no published rate.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Supio review →
Built from published materials: agentic AI for plaintiff firms, chronologies to demand letters, subscription pricing with no published rate.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
InPractice AI review →
Built from published materials: $0.05/page pay-as-you-go record review, about 3 seconds a page, full price disclosure, and the alternatives.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
SiftMed review →
Built from published materials: AI file review for insurance and legal, under 30 minutes per claim file, no published pricing, and alternatives.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
EvenUp review →
Built from published materials: AI demand packages with 100+ expert QA, an Express 1-24 hour tier, and quote-based contracts with no published rate.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Eve (eve.legal) review →
Built from published materials: EveOS for plaintiff firms, demand letters in minutes, quote-based pricing with no published rate.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Filevine review →
Built from published materials: case management with AI Fields, Demands AI, and Medchron chronologies, quote-based with no published figures.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Datavant review →
Built from published materials: the Ciox Health retrieval network, risk adjustment coding, and tokenization; no pricing or turnaround published.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
ChartSwap review →
Built from published materials: B2B record exchange linking requesters and providers, per-transaction fees, 7.5-day turnaround, HITRUST r2.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Lexitas review →
Built from published materials: court reporting, record retrieval, and AI chronologies through a 30,000-strong network, with no published pricing.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
ExamWorks review →
Built from published materials: IME, peer review, bill review, and retrieval subsidiaries, URAC and HITRUST certified, no published pricing.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Dane Street review →
Built from published materials: physician IME and peer review for workers’ comp, auto, and disability, URAC and HITRUST certified, no pricing.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
CLARA Analytics review →
Built from published materials: AI claims intelligence for insurers with the adjuster deciding, quote-based pricing, no published rate.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
CaseMark review →
Built from published materials: AI deposition summaries and cited chronologies, free to start with a $100/user/month Pro plan, SOC 2 Type II.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Tavrn review →
Built from published materials: AI retrieval and chronologies for plaintiff firms, ~$40 per record request plus provider fees, chronology in an hour.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Compex Legal Services review →
Built from published materials: nationwide retrieval since 1972, Asabell AI summarization, 15-20 day average turnaround, no published rate.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Abstractive Health review →
Built from published materials: clinical AI summaries in minutes, a free tier, $99/user/month Standalone, FHIR and JSON export.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Superinsight review →
Built from published materials: 100% AI review at $25-$80 per credit, chronologies $28-$54, reports in 15-60 minutes.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
InQuery review →
Built from published materials: AI plus human QA for claims work, 2-6 hours on a 300-500 page PI case, no published pricing.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Dodonai review →
Built from published materials: usage-based subscriptions at $25-$83/month, roughly $0.008-$0.06 a page, summaries in minutes.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
CaseFleet review →
Built from published materials: litigation fact management with AI review, $30-$180 per user per month, users approve every extracted fact.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
MediScan review →
Built from published materials: 100% AI review for IME/QME physicians, $169-$445 monthly tiers, 1,000+ pages in under 15 minutes.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Brighterway review →
Built from published materials: 100% AI workers’ comp record review from a YC-backed startup, fully demo-gated, no pricing or turnaround.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
LawPro.ai review →
Built from published materials: citation-backed AI review for PI firms, contact-for-pricing subscription, a 404 pricing page at capture.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Anytime AI review →
Built from published materials: agentic AI for mass tort and med mal work, quote-based with no pricing page, hours-not-days turnaround.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
Parambil review →
Built from published materials: agentic AI record review for mass tort, Word/PDF export, no published pricing, a 95% faster claim with no baseline.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
OctopusLM review →
Built from published materials: 100% AI record review at $0.10 a page or $250 a month unlimited, Word and Excel export, HIPAA and PIPEDA.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
CaseFrame AI review →
Built from published materials: chronology software at a flat $200/month or $2,200/year, minutes turnaround, Word and HTML export.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
TackleAI review →
Built from published materials: searchable chronologies from records, billing, and pharmacy data; 3 of 8 rubric facts published, no pricing.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
OraClaim review →
Built from published materials: defense-side claims AI with a first-draft chronology in under 60 minutes and no published pricing.
2026-09-01 · 7 min read
The corpus behind these studies is public: 328 profiles across software and services, each scored on eight rows. For head-to-head vendor comparisons rather than market-wide findings, see the alternatives pages.
Every number here is checkable
Including ours. Ten cents a page, duplicates not billed. Send a real file and compare the output with what you are paying for today.
Test a file