NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's one-page report. See how →
HomeSolutionsLegal

Medical record review for legal

Drop the file. Get the defensible picture of the case.

Upload a messy claim file — Medrecords returns it sorted, searchable, and cited: the timeline, the contradictions, and the facts that decide liability, causation, and damages.

Ask Index Timeline Report Doe, Jane · 282 pp
Ask anything about this file
What treatments did the patient receive? How did the injury occur? Where are the gaps in care? Is causation supported by the record?
Source · p.47100%

The status quo

Legal teams spend weeks reviewing claim files by hand — medical records, statements, employment files. Paralegal review and outsourcing are slow, costly, and prone to miss the fact that decides the case.

0
pages in a typical claim file
0 hrs
of manual review per file
0 fact
missed can decide the outcome

Get the defensible blueprint — without assembling it yourself.

Everything you need to assess the case — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the file, pulls the key medical facts, and builds summaries backed by citations, so your team works on strategy, not sorting.

Case summary · auto-drafted

p.12p.47p.118

Summaries: the whole case in one view

A complete, structured summary that surfaces delayed care, missing records, and conflicting narratives — every claim traced back to the page it came from.

Chronology · by date

Feb 11X-Ray — Chest
Apr 02Progress Note
May 22MRI — Cervical imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Consultation Report

Automated chronology: every event in order

Every page placed by date, provider, and event — with imaging inline and gaps flagged. Scroll the case instead of hunting through PDFs.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Indexing & dedup: a clean, searchable file

Medrecords detects duplicates, flags mismatches, and separates unrelated claimants — so the file you build on is one you can search, filter, and trust.

Human-verifiedCase #12345
Patient nameJane Doe
Date of birth1985-04-15
DiagnosisRight arm fracture
Diagnosis codeS42.301A
Surgery date2024-10-07

AI + human QA: verified, not just generated

Every extracted field is reviewed by a medical expert before it reaches you. Confidence without the double-checking — outputs you can rely on from the start.

Adapts to each claim

Built for legal case strategy.

You shouldn't have to patch together PDFs, spreadsheets, and Word docs to assess causation. Medrecords gives you one structured, defensible view — ready for strategy.

01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Billing Statements
03Aug 06Physician Notes
PDF DOC JPG

Focus on the facts that matter for your defense

Configure custom review templates so you can prioritize what wins — treatment gaps, conflicting narratives, causation. Your team gets exactly what it needs to build the stronger argument.

See the structure of the case before you dig in

Medrecords processes the full record with AI, then every output is reviewed by medical experts — giving you confidence in the facts before you open the first file.

Who this is for

You're three weeks from deposition. The file is 2,400 pages.

Defense counsel isn't paid to sort records — you're paid to find the fact that turns the case and defend it under oath. Medrecords reads the whole file first, so your prep starts at the strategy.

Prior injuries and contradictions surfaced before opposing counsel finds them
A cited chronology ready to drop into exhibits and motions
Every line of the summary traceable to its source page in one click
Deposition prep · Doe v. Acme cited
Q: "Any prior injuries before the accident?"transcript
2019 lumbar strain — found in intake formEx.14 · p.412
Gap in care — 47 days after MRIp.212
History inconsistent across providersp.88 · p.412
Found in the record — ready for cross

Stop sorting documents. Start building the case.

Process high-volume claim files with structured, expert-verified outputs — ready for liability, causation, and damages.