NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's one-page report. See how →
HomeSolutionsLegal Nurse Consultants

Medical record review for LNCs

Deliver the chronology in hours — not weeks.

Medrecords does the sorting, deduping, and first-pass chronology — and hands you a cited, structured file, so your clinical judgment goes further, on more cases.

Ask Index Timeline Report Doe, Jane · 282 pp
Ask anything about this file
What treatments did the patient receive? How did the injury occur? Where are the gaps in care? Is causation supported by the record?
Source · p.47100%

The status quo

LNCs build the medical story by hand — sorting, dating, and deduping thousands of pages before the analysis can start. The prep work is slow, unbillable at full value, and caps the caseload you can take.

0
pages in a typical claim file
0 hrs
of sorting before analysis starts
0 fact
missed can decide the outcome

Start from a structured file — not a records dump.

Everything you need to assess the case — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the file, pulls the key medical facts, and builds summaries backed by citations, so your team works on strategy, not sorting.

Case summary · auto-drafted

p.12p.47p.118

Summaries: the whole case in one view

A complete, structured summary that surfaces delayed care, missing records, and conflicting narratives — every claim traced back to the page it came from.

Chronology · by date

Feb 11X-Ray — Chest
Apr 02Progress Note
May 22MRI — Cervical imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Consultation Report

Automated chronology: every event in order

Every page placed by date, provider, and event — with imaging inline and gaps flagged. Scroll the case instead of hunting through PDFs.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Indexing & dedup: a clean, searchable file

Medrecords detects duplicates, flags mismatches, and separates unrelated claimants — so the file you build on is one you can search, filter, and trust.

Human-verifiedCase #12345
Patient nameJane Doe
Date of birth1985-04-15
DiagnosisRight arm fracture
Diagnosis codeS42.301A
Surgery date2024-10-07

AI + human QA: verified, not just generated

Every extracted field is reviewed by a medical expert before it reaches you. Confidence without the double-checking — outputs you can rely on from the start.

Adapts to each claim

Built for clinical analysis.

Your value is judgment, not data entry. Medrecords hands you the organized, cited record — so every hour you bill is an hour of analysis.

01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Billing Statements
03Aug 06Physician Notes
PDF DOC JPG

Apply clinical judgment, not data entry

The sorting, indexing, and dating is done before you open the file. Your review starts at the analysis — gaps, causation, standard of care — not at page one.

Every finding cited for the attorney

Deliverables the legal team can verify at a glance: every entry in the chronology and every conclusion in the summary links to its source page.

Who this is for

The attorney needs the chronology Friday. It's Tuesday.

You know what matters clinically — the job is getting through the pages in time. Medrecords delivers the sorted, deduped, first-pass chronology, so your hours go into the analysis the attorney is paying for.

Sorting, dating, and dedup done before you open the file
First-pass chronology ready for your clinical review
Deliverables the legal team can verify line by line
Chronology draft · due Friday Tuesday
1,847 pages sorted, dated, deduped → 612done
First-pass chronology — 84 eventsdone
Missing records — 2 providers flaggedrequest sent
Your clinical annotations — in progressp.212 →
The analysis started Tuesday — not the sorting

Take on more cases — without cutting corners.

Structured, expert-verified files that let you deliver defensible chronologies and summaries at a pace manual review can't match.