NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
Home›Solutions›Settlement Administrators
Medical record review for settlement administrators

Tier claims by injury. At MDL scale.

For mass tort settlement administrators, Medrecords AI reads the medical record behind every claim form — so injury tier, exposure window, and qualifying criteria get decided the same way across thousands of claimants. Built for claims administrators and review teams scoring claimant files against a court-approved settlement matrix’s medical criteria.

By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder & CEO of Medrecords AI · Published 29 Aug 2026 · Updated 14 Sep 2026Summarize with ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Google AI

Claimant batch · organizing review-ready
4,200 files → tiered by injury criteria
612 pp avg per claimant, deduplicated & indexed
Qualifying diagnosis — cited to pathology report, p. 118
Built for the docket, not just the file.
The status quo
205,540 lawsuits pending across 162 active federal MDLs
one settlement matrix, thousands of files to score against it
inconsistent tiering is what reopens a settlement to challenge

the vendor a claim file that's already organized.

Everything the tier decision needs — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes each claimant file, builds the medical timeline, and drafts the history with citations, so your time goes to the matrix and the scoring.

Claim file · from your templateYour template
p.31 p.212 p.640

Custom reports: your letterhead, your voice

Templates draft the medical history and the qualifying-criteria review with inline citations. You apply the matrix and the score. Export clean, in your format, every time.

Chronology · by date
2019Prior injury · lumbar strain, pre-DOI
Feb 11Date of injury — ER visit
May 22MRI — Lumbar imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Orthopedic consultation

Automated chronology: the history in order

Injury tier, exposure window, and qualifying criteria — every element dated, sourced, and in sequence. The whole claimant file scannable before you score it.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Dedup & indexing: shrink the claim file first

Claimant files arrive bloated with duplicates and misfiled pages. Medrecords removes the redundancy and indexes what remains — so you read each page once.

Cross-checked · multi-modelClaim #M-2210
Claimant nameJane Doe✓
Date of injury2024-02-11✓
DiagnosisLumbar disc herniation✓
Prior injury2019 lumbar strain✓
Treatment to datePT ×12 · ESI ×2✓

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged, so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Built for expert-level decisions.

Contradictions, diagnostic inconsistencies, prior injuries: surfaced with citations, scored for confidence, and left for you to weigh. The judgment stays yours.

See the full IME workflow, capability by capability →
Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged One DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Imaging Reports
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Surface the clinical details that change opinions

Contradictions across providers, diagnostic inconsistencies, and key clinical events — highlighted on the timeline and cited to the page, so you analyze instead of search.

We help you make the call. The last word is yours.

AI does the reading, every line stays reviewable and traceable, and verification is 1 click to the source. The findings and the opinion remain yours. As they should.

You're the expert. Reading shouldn't be the job.

Claims administrators and review teams scoring thousands of claimant files against a settlement matrix's medical criteria.

Contradictions and diagnostic inconsistencies highlighted with sources
Records oriented by provider, facility, and date at a glance
More files per week, with the same clinical rigor
Records review · file 3 of 9 today panel-ready
Dx: cervical radiculopathy — progress notep.212
EMG negative — 6 weeks laterconflict · p.388
Prior claim, same body part — 2021p.63
ROM measurements — all visits, comparedtable
Contradictions found for you — conclusions stay yours

“Can this handle criteria that change across settlement tiers or amendments?”

Yes — qualifying criteria are configurable per matrix, and every file re-scores against the current version, cited to the record.

Built for the defensible tier.

A single platform, built for everyone who works the file.

The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam.

Roles
Plaintiff AttorneysProve the injury, dollar by dollar Defense CounselSurface the case-deciding fact Legal Nurse ConsultantsChronologies in a fraction of the time IME & QME PhysiciansDefensible IME opinions, faster Medical Expert WitnessesCited opinions, not paper chases Claims Adjusters & ExaminersTriage and settle sooner Forensic EvaluatorsYour report format, fully cited Medical Examiners & CoronersThe history before the certification Life Care Planners & Vocational ExpertsCost projections built on the full record VA-Accredited RepresentativesThe whole C-file before you file C&P ExaminersC-files, exam-ready on time Social Security Disability RepresentativesYears of records, 1 hearing
Organizations
Insurance CarriersScale review across every claim Law FirmsLitigation-ready case files TPAs & Case ManagementStandardize across clients Government & Public SectorCompliant, auditable records IME Companies & NetworksOne pipeline, every physician Self-InsurersClaims reviewed like a carrier would Disability InsurersLTD/STD files, cited every cycle Settlement AdministratorsYOU ARE HERETier claims at MDL scale VA C&P Exam ContractorsC-files, exam-ready on time Hospital Risk ManagementKnow the chart before counsel does Litigation FundersUnderwrite the file, not the pitch Medical Funders & Lien NetworksFund the treatment, verify the file
Use Cases
Social Security DisabilityTimeline ready before the hearing Personal Injury PlaintiffCited evidence on demand Personal Injury DefenseVerify specials, flag the gaps Veteran DisabilityTimeline built before the exam Workers' CompensationTrack treatment and gaps Mass TortQualify claimants at scale Medical MalpracticeReconstruct the timeline Auto Bodily Injury ClaimsSpecials and causation, cited
Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise

Settlement Administrators, answered.

Yes — claim forms and medical records are processed together into one claimant file.

Each diagnosis is scored and cited independently against matrix criteria.

Ask for a benchmark against a sample batch — turnaround scales with average file size, not just count.

CONTENT HUB

The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers’ compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login.

Browse the Content Hub

Send a sample batch.

Read the tiered, cited output. Then decide.

Ranked lists