1 cited chronology per child and per parent, from every collateral record.
Child custody evaluation record review merges the collateral records of a court-ordered evaluation, pediatric, school, therapy, CPS and police, into 1 page-cited chronology per child and per parent. Medrecords AI organizes, cites and flags what the records document. It draws no conclusion about parenting. The evaluator and the court decide.
Self-Service starts at 10 cents a deduplicated page, down to 5 cents at volume. Duplicate pages are free. Enterprise On-Prem is an annual license, no per-seat fees. First case is free on us.
See the custody evaluation collateral records summary sample before you book.
The appointment order sets the questions. The evaluator and the court answer them.
We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In court-ordered child custody evaluations, both are already published.
3 steps between the records and the evaluation.
Send the records for every parent and child
Medical, psychiatric, substance treatment and pharmacy records for each parent, pediatric, therapy and school records for each child, CPS files, police reports, and prior orders and evaluations, in any format.
Get the digest back, 1 chronology per child and per parent
Separate cited chronologies that read side by side, with treatment course, adherence, CPS contact, police contact and school findings carried as their own rows, each with its page.
The evaluator evaluates
Interviews, observation, testing and the best-interests analysis are the evaluator's work, and the recommendation is theirs to make. The guardian ad litem reads the same digest. It is the cited documentary record underneath both.
A cited record, not a custody recommendation.
Medrecords AI assembles and cites what the records document. It does not interview or observe anyone, administer or score any instrument, assess parenting capacity, or recommend a custody or parenting-time arrangement. It draws no conclusion about either parent. Those belong to the evaluator and to the court.
Roughly a third of a custody file is medical and the rest is school, therapy, CPS, police and correspondence. All of it is read. A CPS referral that was screened out still shows as a cited entry, because the evaluator needs to know it exists, not to be told what it means.
The rules the platform never breaks.
EVERY LINE CITED
HIPAA, under a signed BAA
Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.
Never trains a model
Your records are never used to train any AI model, ours or anyone else's.
Every line cited
If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.
Deleted on request
Retention is configurable and deletion is on request, with a full audit log of every access.
7 capabilities behind every custody record digest.
The custody record digest is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.
Medical Records OCR
Every page for every parent and child is read, including the school files, police reports and handwritten CPS notes that carry most of the observations.
Medical Chronology
1 chronology per child and per parent, aligned on the same dates, so a household is readable as a whole instead of as 5 separate files.
Verifiable AI Citations
Every entry links to its page, so a report challenged at hearing is answered from the record in 1 click.
Medical Summary Reports
It exports into the evaluator's report structure, the guardian ad litem's file or a second-opinion critique, in your format.
Medical Record Deduplication
Records for 2 parents and 3 children arrive from pediatricians, therapists, schools, CPS and police, and the same visit note or report often arrives twice. Each duplicate is matched and collapsed to 1 record, so every encounter is read once and billed never.
Missing Records Identification
A custody digest is only as sound as the file behind it. When a therapy note references a CPS referral, a school record references a counselor report, or a pediatric chart references a visit that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged with its page before the report goes to the court.
Cross-Exam Simulator (beta)
Opposing counsel builds the cross-examination from the records the report relied on. This beta tool maps the questions an evaluator is likely to face at hearing about the entries the report addressed and the entries it did not. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.
Custody evaluation record review, answered.
Send 1 file. We'll tell you what we can read.
No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.
Field guides
- Collateral records in forensic evaluation: what to request, how to read them, and where AI fitsWhich collateral records a forensic evaluation needs, the legal route to each (HIPAA, Part 2, FERPA, subpoena)…
- Child abuse medical records: sentinel injuries, abusive head trauma and the workupHow to read child abuse medical records: sentinel injuries, TEN-4-FACESp, the skeletal survey, the abusive head…