How the fall is described
Every account of the mechanism, from EMS, triage, the physician and later providers, quoted with the page. A slip, a trip and a misstep are different cases.
mechanismMedrecords AI puts the mechanism in the first medical note beside the one in the complaint, then builds the treatment chronology with every gap and every old finding on the same body part. Every entry links to its page. Causation stays with your experts.
"Tripped over a pallet in the aisle."
Older adults in the US who report a fall each year.
CDCThe code for a fall on the same level from slipping, tripping or stumbling. The code in the chart can pin the mechanism.
ICD-10-CMAny break in treatment longer than this is flagged with both dates.
Medrecords AIHow fast Medrecords AI reads the file.
Medrecords AIA fall case is short on witnesses and long on assumptions. The defense builds its version from the first medical note and the old records. These are the pages it reaches for.
Every account of the mechanism, from EMS, triage, the physician and later providers, quoted with the page. A slip, a trip and a misstep are different cases.
mechanismWhat hurt on day 1, in the patient's words. A body part that shows up weeks later is flagged.
citedEvery interval over 30 days between visits, with both dates. The adjuster will find it. You see it first.
flaggedPrior imaging and complaints on the same body part, with the radiologist's words carried verbatim.
same body partDizziness, neuropathy, vision problems and fall risk medications from before the fall, with pages. The defense will use them to shift the cause.
flaggedThe incident report the ED note mentions, the imaging a referral ordered, the therapy discharge. Listed with the page that points to each one.
missing-records list| Date | Source | Finding | Page | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Feb 2023 | Primary care | Right knee pain. X-ray: mild osteoarthritis. | p. 402 | same body part |
| 18 Sep 2024 | Primary care, annual exam | Walks 2 miles a day. No joint complaints. | p. 431 | baseline |
| Date | Source | Finding | Page | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Jan 2025, 14:20 | ED triage | "Slipped on a wet floor at the store, landed on right knee." | p. 12 | mechanism |
| 11 Jan 2025, 16:05 | ED physician note | "Tripped over a pallet in the aisle." | p. 15 | conflicts with p. 12 |
| 27 Jan 2025 | Orthopedics | Knee brace. MRI ordered. | p. 40 | cited |
| 14 Feb 2025 | Imaging center | Medial meniscus tear. Moderate osteoarthritis. | p. 58 | compare p. 402 |
| 10 Mar to 25 Apr 2025 | No provider | No visits for 46 days. | none | gap, 46 days |
| 2 May 2025 | Orthopedic surgery | Arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy. | p. 97 | cited |
We assemble and cite what the providers wrote about the fall and the treatment. We do not address the walking surface or the property owner's notice, and we do not say the fall caused the diagnosis. Those belong to you and your experts.
Each version is quoted with its page and timestamp and the conflict is flagged in its own state. We do not pick one or reconcile them. It is usually the most consequential fact in the file, and it belongs in front of counsel rather than smoothed over.
No. ASTM F1637 and A1264.2 are the liability expert’s ground, not ours. We report what the medical record says about how the person fell and what happened to them, so the liability expert has an accurate mechanism to work from.
Prior complaints and prior imaging on the same body part are flagged with dates and pages, whether or not they help. The defense examiner will find them, so the useful version is the one you already have with citations attached.
No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have, and review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days. You can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.
Book a short demo. After it we open trial access on one of your own cases, the first one free on us, with the chronology back page-cited.